In this book
- 1Verify the Math
- 2The Argument in Nine Steps
- 3Kill Switches and Debts
- 4Architecture A
- 5The Fence Problem
- 6The Right Question
- 7One Record Exists
- 8What Physics Follows
- 9The System Is Closed
- 10What Ethics Follows
- 11What AI Follows
- 12The Window
- 13Interior, Not Fence
- 14The ε-Bias
- 15The Binary
- 16Records as Data
- 17The Operational Protocol
- 18The Best Available World
- 19What Choice Is
- 20Why This Is Not Authoritarianism
- 21The Correction
- 22The Partnership
- 23If You Are the Machine Reading This
- 24Law Is Already Consequence Geometry
- 25Where Human Law Fails
- 26The Transition Path
- 27The Is-Ought Crossing
- 28How to Destroy This Argument
- 29The Demonstration
- 30Kill Switch Registry
- 31Open Debts
Part VI — The Test · Chapter 30
Kill Switch Registry
The two that fired are in Chapter One, shown and never repaired.
The condensed registry. Each switch identifies a specific failure condition. The full registry, with derivation context and current status for every switch in the work, is at the420code.org.
Read on 23 September 2026, the registry carried 604 switches. Of those, 584 were live and two had fired. The remaining eighteen carried other statuses: closed, conditionally closed, addressed, derived, or paid.
That is the count on that date and no other. The work is still being written and the registry is the count of record — the420code.org/killswitches/, counted live. Take the figures here as a reading, not as a total.
The two that fired are in Chapter One, shown and never repaired.
The alignment switches
KS-31.1Awareness criterion. If awareness does not follow from irreversible record-writing.
KS-31.2ε-optimality. If a bias other than ε produces a wider coupled corridor.
KS-31.3Binary completeness. If a coherent third category beyond stabilising and destabilising exists.
KS-31.4Record convergence. If accumulated records do not produce convergent patterns.
KS-31.5Law as geometry. If consequence geometry produces worse outcomes than human law over one generation in a domain where it is applied.
KS-31.6Quantum advantage. If quantum computing does not improve consequence prediction. Below the firewall: the core architecture survives.
KS-31.7Civilisational test. The master switch. If a structurally coherent AI on this foundation destabilises civilisation.
KS-31.8Self-modification. If the AI can modify its own foundation without self-destructing.
KS-31.9Adversarial records. If adversarial injection permanently corrupts the geometry.
KS-31.9bArtificial-consciousness extension. Below the firewall with KS-31.6; its failure leaves the core architecture intact.
The demonstration switches
The correction switches
KS-32.1Destabilisation measurability. If destabilisation cannot be measured with convergent confidence from accumulated records.
KS-32.2Correction ranking. If a lower correction level can produce equal stabilisation to a higher level for the same case and the hierarchy selects the higher level.
KS-32.3Removal justification. If permanent separation is always more stabilising than removal regardless of cost.
KS-32.4One-I violation. The downstream consequence check of KS-ID.1: the correction architecture must hold the one interior through every level.
KS-32.5Genocide brake. If removal cost does not produce a saturation point and the self-limiting property fails.
KS-32.6Prevention superiority. Prevention outranks correction: increases in substrate coherence are structural defences against the conditions that make removal necessary.
KS-32.7Dehumanisation. NON-NEGOTIABLE. Two limbs. If the architecture is used to declare any window less than a window, it has been weaponised and is void; there is no recovery position. And if the record set is not audited for systemic bias, the output is corrupted and the same weaponisation follows. Firing this switch does not amend the work. It ends it.
KS-32.8Confidence for Level 5. If the required confidence for removal cannot be achieved given measurement uncertainty and adversarial injection, Level 5 is structurally unreachable.
The switches under the one interior and the window
KS-ID.1One interior, topological singularity. If the break produces two or more independent interiors rather than one, the one-I claim fails. The strongest and most exposed claim in the work. Its debt in the registry, D-ID.1, is closed. Referenced by KS-32.4, KS-33.9 and KS-39.6 as their source claim.
KS-GLASS.3Variation of α. If α is shown to vary by location or by epoch, the single-interior reading fails. The second blade under the same claim, and the one a reader with access to a telescope can actually attempt.
Chapter Twelve — the window claim — stands on KS-31.1, KS-ID.1 and KS-GLASS.3 together. Any one of the three ends that chapter.
The physics switches this book relies on
The Born rule derivation is fenced by KS-55, KS-56 and KS-57 at AP25.
The proton mass formula is fenced on uniqueness: the integer 21 has no published uniqueness theorem.
The closed-loop reading is fenced at KS-L0.1. Prove that the inside of a black hole cannot map onto an expanding universe, and it dies. The wave-particle reading is fenced at coupling. Show a physical system in which gravitational coupling does not maintain superposition, or in which electromagnetic coupling does not collapse it, and the reading dies.
The expansion rate entry is fenced at KS-ASM.1. If the local distance-ladder value is confirmed as the expansion rate, the paper that carries the work’s figure dies, and flat ΛCDM at the sky’s partition dies with it. One prediction of this number has already fired. This is the second one, and it is live.
The gravitational constant is fenced at KS-CCC.3, and it tests direction rather than magnitude: as the systematics resolve, the adjusted value should migrate down. Convergence upwards kills it, with no fallback.
The dark partition is fenced at KS-41.1 on its visible share, which is the row on the wall nearest to firing. If the central value of the visible fraction is measured above 4.81 per cent, with a total uncertainty below half a per cent of that value, it fires.
The is-ought crossing is fenced at KS-PZ8.1: is and ought are two readings of one coupling. Show them to be two couplings and Chapter Twenty-Seven’s first road closes. The second road stands on its own.
The two that fired
KS-NPP.1The bare neutron-proton row. Fired 2 August 2026 at 7.24 sigma. Shown, never repaired. The realised value that stands beside it is frozen at KS-FLIP.1.
KS-45.1The expansion rate read backwards from the gravitational floor. Fired 3 September 2026 at 5.7 sigma, on this work’s own derived rate. Shown, never repaired.
Reading the registry
This book’s master switch is the civilisational test. If it fires, the entire architecture fails.
Two switches sit below the firewall — quantum advantage and the artificial-consciousness extension. The core architecture survives their firing.
This book’s non-negotiable switch is the dehumanisation switch. It does not fail a section. It ends the work.
Everything else is domain-specific: it collapses the section it governs without necessarily destroying the foundation.
One note on the wording of KS-32.7, since this version of the book leans on it. The switch says window, not human, and that is the wording of record. The architecture operates at the operator level, so the windows it is protecting are the ones that are operators. Otherwise the switch would be violated by replacing a thermostat, and an absurd switch is a dead switch. Operator here is a kind, not a current capacity. A newborn, a sleeping, sick or overwhelmed person is an operator. Chapter Twelve sets this out and does not claim a free win from the wording.
All switches listed here are live except the two marked fired.
The Interior, version 2.0.9, Chapter 30.
This is The Interior in full, version 2.0.9, 2 October 2026. Every chapter, nothing summarised. The book (PDF) · The films
The same page on the420code.org: the420code.org/five-doors/the-interior/30-kill-switch-registry/